Corporate Run-Media feeding COVID-19 Misinformation
- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 4 years, 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
Turn on the TV anytime nowadays and all you will see and hear are news and reports of COVID-19 healthcare crisis. The continuous coverage of news that mostly present inaccurate and false narratives of COVID-19 pandemic creates fear, anxiety, and presents disproportionate level of pessimism that blocks rational thinking and brainwashes the masses into the globalists’ agenda. Their agenda is to inflict severe economic distress, cower to their demands to invade your privacy and autonomy, devalue your quality of life, and disrupt normal social interactions of one’s life. These goals are achieved through edicts or mandates by government officials without any solid, valid, and reliable evidence that you should practice social distancing, all people in public should wear a mask, shut down schools, stop non-essential services, close restaurants, and prevent any other normal functions of society. However, the evidence for these pronouncements is not clear and comes from professionals or so-called experts who trade truth for time in the spotlight, chance to earn some lucrative money, and being complicit in rendering false public policies.
The U.S.A. finds itself in COVID-19 healthcare crisis due to incompetence on part of government officials, public health experts, healthcare professionals, vested interests of big pharmaceutical, biotech, and lab testing business who stand to profit from therapeutics and mass vaccination paradigm as end goals for the globalists in this COVID-19 pandemic. The few experts in their respective fields who disagree with current COVID-19 in U.S.A. and elsewhere in the world don’t get their due media coverage since their narratives, opinions, and advice goes counter to the globalists’ agenda that has corporate-run media as its propaganda machine. Nonetheless, the following experts challenge the current COVID-19 strategy. Check out what they say or think:
Dr Sucharit Bhakdi is a noted microbiologist and a professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and director of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene.
What he states:
“We are afraid that 1 million infections with the new virus will lead to 30 deaths per day over the next 100 days. But we do not realise that 20, 30, 40 or 100 patients positive for normal coronaviruses are already dying every day.
[The government’s anti-COVID19 measures] are grotesque, absurd and very dangerous […] The life expectancy of millions is being shortened. The horrifying impact on the world economy threatens the existence of countless people. The consequences on medical care are profound. Already services to patients in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling. All this will impact profoundly on our whole society.
All these measures are leading to self-destruction and collective suicide based on nothing but a spook.“
Dr John Ioannidis Professor of Medicine of Health Research and Policy and of Biomedical Data Science at Stanford University School of Medicine and a Professor of Statistics at Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences. Additionally, he is head of the Stanford Prevention Research Center and joint director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS).
Dr. Ioannidis is also the editor-in-chief of the European Journal of Clinical Investigation. Previously, he was chairman at the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine and adjunct professor at Tufts University School of Medicine.
Being a physician, research scientist, and author, he has made significant contributions to evidence-based medicine, epidemiology, data science and clinical research. In addition, he pioneered the field of meta-research. He has shown that much of the published research lacks good scientific standards of evidence to be taken as serious, valid science for health and policy decisions.
Here is what he thinks:
“Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes. As most health systems have limited testing capacity, selection bias may even worsen in the near future.
The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher.
[…]
Could the Covid-19 case fatality rate be that low? No, some say, pointing to the high rate in elderly people. However, even some so-called mild or common-cold-type coronaviruses that have been known for decades can have case fatality rates as high as 8% when they infect elderly people in nursing homes.
[…]
If we had not known about a new virus out there, and had not checked individuals with PCR tests, the number of total deaths due to “influenza-like illness” would not seem unusual this year. At most, we might have casually noted that flu this season seems to be a bit worse than average.“
– “A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data”, Stat News, 17th March 2020
Dr Yoram Lass is a physician, politician and former Director General of the Health Ministry in Israel. He was formed Associate Dean of the Tel Aviv University Medical School and during the 1980s, he hosted a science-based television show called Tatzpit.
This is what he states:
“Italy is known for its enormous morbidity in respiratory problems, more than three times any other European country. In the US about 40,000 people die in a regular flu season and so far 40-50 people have died of the coronavirus, most of them in a nursing home in Kirkland, Washington.
[…]
In every country, more people die from regular flu compared with those who die from the coronavirus.
[…]
…there is a very good example that we all forget: the swine flu in 2009. That was a virus that reached the world from Mexico and until today there is no vaccination against it. But what? At that time there was no Facebook or there maybe was but it was still in its infancy. The coronavirus, in contrast, is a virus with public relations.
Whoever thinks that governments end viruses is wrong.“
– Interview in Globes, March 22nd 2020
Michael T. Osterholm is professor and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota.
He thinks that TOTAL LOCKDOWNS are wrong:
“Consider the effect of shutting down offices, schools, transportation systems, restaurants, hotels, stores, theaters, concert halls, sporting events and other venues indefinitely and leaving all of their workers unemployed and on the public dole. The likely result would be not just a depression but a complete economic breakdown, with countless permanently lost jobs, long before a vaccine is ready or natural immunity takes hold.
[…]
[T]he best alternative will probably entail letting those at low risk for serious disease continue to work, keep business and manufacturing operating, and “run” society, while at the same time advising higher-risk individuals to protect themselves through physical distancing and ramping up our health-care capacity as aggressively as possible. With this battle plan, we could gradually build up immunity without destroying the financial structure on which our lives are based.“
– “Facing covid-19 reality: A national lockdown is no cure”, Washington Post 21st March 2020
Dr Peter Goetzsche is Professor of Clinical Research Design and Analysis at the University of Copenhagen and founded the Cochrane Medical Collaboration. He is author of several books on corruption in the field of medicine and the pervasive influence and vested interests of big pharmaceutical companies.
His thoughts are as follows:
“Our main problem is that no one will ever get in trouble for measures that are too draconian. They will only get in trouble if they do too little. So, our politicians and those working with public health do much more than they should do.
No such draconian measures were applied during the 2009 influenza pandemic, and they obviously cannot be applied every winter, which is all year round, as it is always winter somewhere. We cannot close down the whole world permanently.
Should it turn out that the epidemic wanes before long, there will be a queue of people wanting to take credit for this. And we can be damned sure draconian measures will be applied again next time. But remember the joke about tigers. “Why do you blow the horn?” “To keep the tigers away.” “But there are no tigers here.” “There you see!” “
– “Corona: an epidemic of mass panic”, blog post on Deadly Medicines 21st March 2020
Dr Anders Tegnell is a Swedish physician and government official who has been State Epidemiologist of the Public Health Agency of Sweden since 2013. Dr Tegnell, a graduate from medical school in 1985 specializes in infectious disease. He also obtained a PhD in Medical Science from Linköping University in 2003 and an MSc in 2004.
Dr. Tegnell’s view mirrors Sweden’s NO LOCKDOWN, NO MASKS public policy:
“All measures that we take must be feasible over a longer period of time.” Otherwise, the population will lose acceptance of the entire corona strategy.
Older people or people with previous health problems should be isolated as much as possible. So no visits to children or grandchildren, no journeys by public transport, if possible no shopping. That is the one rule. The other is: Anyone with symptoms should stay at home immediately, even with the slightest cough.
“If you follow these two rules, you don’t need any further measures, the effect of which is only very marginal anyway,”
– “The World Stands Still…Except for Sweden”, Zeit.de, 24th March 2020
Dr Wolfgang Wodarg is a German physician with specialty in Pulmonology. He is also a politician and former chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. In 2009, he demanded an inquiry into alleged conflicts of interest surrounding the European Union’s handling to the Swine Flu pandemic.
The following is what he states:
“Politicians are being courted by scientists…scientists who want to be important to get money for their institutions. Scientists who just swim along in the mainstream and want their part of it […] And what is missing right now is a rational way of looking at things.
We should be asking questions like “How did you find out this virus was dangerous?”, “How was it before?”, “Didn’t we have the same thing last year?”, “Is it even something new?”
That’s missing.“
Dr Pablo Goldschmidt is an Argentine-French virologist specializing in tropical diseases and Professor of Molecular Pharmacology at the Université Pierre et Marie Curie in Paris. He is former graduate of the Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry of the University of Buenos Aires and Faculty of Medicine of the Hospital Center of Pitié-Salpetrière, Paris.
He presently lives in France and has contributed for almost 40 years as a researcher in clinical laboratories developing diagnostic technology.
He states the following:
“The ill-founded opinions expressed by international experts, replicated by the media and social networks repeat the unnecessary panic that we have previously experienced. The coronavirus identified in China in 2019 caused nothing less than a strong cold or flu, with no difference so far with cold or flu as we know , ”
[…]
Respiratory viral conditions are numerous and are caused by several viral families and species, among which the respiratory syncytial virus (especially in infants), influenza (influenza), human metapneumoviruses, adenoviruses, rhinoviruses, and various coronaviruses, already described years ago. It is striking that earlier this year global health alerts have been triggered as a result of infections by a coronavirus detected in China, COVID-19, knowing that each year there are 3 million newborns who die in the world of pneumonia and 50,000 adults in the United States for the same cause, without alarms being issued.
[…]
Our planet is the victim of a new sociological phenomenon, scientific-media harassment , triggered by experts only on the basis of laboratory molecular diagnostic analysis results. Communiqués issued from China and Geneva were replicated, without being confronted from a critical point of view and, above all, without stressing that coronaviruses have always infected humans and always caused diarrhoea and what people call a banal cold or common cold. Absurd forecasts were extrapolated, as in 2009 with the H1N1 influenza virus.
[…]
There is no evidence to show that the 2019 coronavirus is more lethal than respiratory adenoviruses, influenza viruses, coronaviruses from previous years, or rhinoviruses responsible for the common cold.“
– Interview on Clarin.com, 9th March 2020
Finally, it is not unheard of, but unknown to the masses that mass media does distort or manipulate pictures and videos to create false narratives of COVID-19 situation in U.S.A. and elsewhere.
Also, certain news channel have habit of showing same footage of I.C.U.’s or hospitals being on overrrun capacity and dire health conditions of patients to viewers of evening news. See ABC News showing same video footage of Maimonides Medical Center’s I.C.U. depicting different days of COVID-19 crisis in New York or images of coffins lined up outside of hospitals! More on corporate-media’s inaccurate news reporting in later topics here or you can present your evidence here, too.
Some interesting food for thoughts, right?!
Now, only if the government, public health officials, and medical establishment become enlightened to enact smart policies based on solid, verifiable, and reliable medical and scientific evidence, then COVID-19 pandemic can turn from public nightmare to very well managed healthcare issue.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
